Marina CCO proposal Debate

Community Wellbeing - Equality & Inclusion

Option 1

Residents supporting Option 1 express concerns about the potential privatization of public assets, emphasizing that profits from such assets should benefit the entire community rather than a select few. They argue that maintaining public ownership ensures that all community members can continue to enjoy the marina and any financial gains it generates. Additionally, there is apprehension about the lack of democratic oversight in controlled organizations, which might not represent or serve the diverse interests of the community effectively.

Table of comments:

Point No	Comment
1108.4	I chose option one because I think the Marina is a valuable asset for the community and I suspect it is likely to become an increasingly valuable asset in the future. Since it is a public asset, all profits should go back towards maintaining or improving the marina. Any extra profits will be valuable income for the community.  I strongly believe that we should NOT sell off public assets so that a small number of people can profit from that. Therefore if option 2 facilitates that process then I am against it. Why can't the council simply figure out how to streamline the decision making structure and process?
1181.4	I'm not into adding more overheads to a council income streams, or having controlled organisations that are not democratically appointed (eg race biased representation).